1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central.

Provided that authors are rewarded for publishing many content articles and editors are rewarded for publishing them rapidly, new means of gaming the traditional publication models will be invented quicker than new control measures can be put in place.. Charlotte J. Haug, M.D., Ph.D.1 The retractions came only weeks after BioMed Central, an open-access publisher owned by Springer, retracted 43 content articles for the same reason. How is it possible to fake peer review? Moon, who studies medicinal plants, had set up a straightforward process. He gave journals recommendations for peer reviewers for his manuscripts, offering them with e-mail and titles addresses. But these addresses had been ones he created, therefore the requests to review went to him or his co-workers directly. The fallout from Moon’s confession: 28 content in various journals released by Informa had been retracted, and one editor resigned.Cebon, the vaccine also appeared to delay the recurrence of cancers, suggesting that some form of protection has been conferred by the vaccine. However, of the individuals who received the full NY-ESO-1/ISCOMATRIXTM vaccine, 14 out of 19 remained cancer-free. Related StoriesCrucial switch in single DNA foundation predisposes children to intense type of cancerStudy shows rare HER2 missense mutations do not spread breast cancer on the ownFDA grants accelerated authorization for Tagrisso to take care of sufferers with advanced NSCLCDespite the encouraging clinical results, the group is quick to point out that this type of retrospective analysis is considered less exact than acquired it been carried out in a planned, prospective style. Ian Davis from the LICR Melbourne Branch, the lead writer of the clinical research.